New Images
12 June 2005
  Come back Kaukasus




2005

Labels:

 
Comments:
What are the sizes of this,and of the previous pieces FEUERSTURM and HIND?

Is FEUERSTURM a collage or a painting and collage or is it a web-based work only? HIND looks like a painting on a photo.

I'm really enjoying your work.
 
Martin,

those works are completely virtual made, sometimes I print them out (or stages of them)and put them in a frame and they hang in a Gallery here in Tbilisi.
Sizes are like 1200x960 px, it depends how I cut them. Then optimized for web, like 600x400 or likely. Based in those cases on a background photo (either scanned or digital shot). The places are real places in Feuersturm the "dangerous" ;-) Pankisi Valley in Georgia (the photo is from 1997) in Hind it is from the roof of my Garage.
Sometimes as in Hind, the original helicopter is a painted part of another painting of mine, what is often a completly different and not related one, then pasted into a new context. Like in Feuersturm, planes and explosions are made artificially, or cutted from random photos from my own, I have there a big material-base at my machine. I am not a Macromedia-Freehand- Freak, or Detail-freak, more lazy in fact, and want thinks have made very fast. Thats why I switched lately more to "virtual" work, and when I paint, it starts again to be a big headache, that's the high limits of painting, wich borders to break happens not so often, quite rarely. How many paintings of Picasso are really great ? 50, 40, 30, 20 ? Out of 3000 (I don't remember) That's why I mistrust "great" trendy painters like Neo Rauch so deeply.
The biggest painter so far (for maybe 10 years today)for me is Gustave Courbet, and even in those virtual works of mine, you can, if you want, see and feel that influence.
So if you like some of my work, it honours me a lot. Use them as material if you like, cut, paste, double, whatever, or make your own ideas. The base of those is very simple, not intellectual. But of course I am often thinking about, why should a work like this beeing cheaper than a real painting, thats bullshit. But we and the critics need to educate buyers on the long run to value such creations in hard money too, like they can get with it a digital signiture and a timestamp an it costs like 900,- USD, if your are famous 90.000
Best regards, I also get a lot of inspiration of your paintings !

Grijsz
 

Post a Comment



<< Home
who owns the images owns the world

ARCHIVES
May 2005 / June 2005 / July 2005 / August 2005 / September 2005 / October 2005 / November 2005 / December 2005 / January 2006 / February 2006 / March 2006 / April 2006 / May 2006 / June 2006 / July 2006 / August 2006 / September 2006 / October 2006 / November 2006 / December 2006 / January 2007 / February 2007 / March 2007 / April 2007 / May 2007 / July 2007 / August 2007 / September 2007 / October 2007 / November 2007 / December 2007 / January 2008 / February 2008 / March 2008 / April 2008 / May 2008 / June 2008 / July 2008 / August 2008 / September 2008 / October 2008 / November 2008 / December 2008 / January 2009 / February 2009 / March 2009 / April 2009 / May 2009 / June 2009 / July 2009 / August 2009 / September 2009 / October 2009 / November 2009 / December 2009 / September 2010 / March 2011 / April 2011 / November 2012 /

Links
Thinking About Art

New Art

rotagavin

KaizerModo

electronetwork.org

tsutpen

Roebling Hall

1+1=1

Kunst-Blog

Speed of Life

Karen

Blog Core Values

ANABA

Edward_Winkleman

Art Soldier

FutureModern

James W.Bailey

PaintersNYC

Artblog.net

studiosavant

Drawer

From the Floor

Kaukasus

Kaukasus-Reisen

Kaukasus-Kaleidoscope

Hans Heiner Buhr

Hans' paintings

Hans' pop art

Hans' animations

Add me to Skype


Powered by Blogger